Reviewing Mother Camp (Fifty Years Late)

This special section reviews Esther Newton's Mother Camp almost fifty years after its initial release, reflecting on its groundbreaking insights as well as its continued relevance. In his introduction, David Valentine writes:


Why review a book—why have an introduction to seven reviews of a book—that was published almost fifty years ago? While Esther Newton's ethnography Mother Camp: Female Impersonators in America is nowadays almost reflexively called a “classic,” that term should raise questions in light of the latest debates about the place of classics and canons in anthropology, the meanings of “ethnography,” and renewed attention to the corrosive consequences of elite, masculinist intellectual networks. Unlike most “classics,” Mother Camphas lived in anthropology's margins; it was never reviewed in an anthropology journal. Its subsequent fame was, rather, established among different disciplinary kin networks even as its theoretical frame was overtaken by transformations in anthropological interests and styles. However, while there are good, festschrift‐y reasons for this special book review section, our goal is neither simply to retrospectively celebrate Newton nor to correct a historical wrong. Collectively, the reviews gathered here argue that there are solid reasons to spend time on Mother Camp as anthropologists in 2018: first, for what it can offer to contemporary disciplinary debates and, second, for understanding the political moment some of us appear to be surprised to be in. The unexpected genre of book review for this task is appropriately performative and campy.


 
Previous
Previous

Using Multimodality to Provide Holistic Context and Promote Engaged Learning in Tajen: Interactive

Next
Next

Leadership and Accountability